Friday, January 28, 2022

Generic Competitive Strategies

Harvard professor, Michael Porter, developed the phrase “generic competitive strategies or GCS” in his business planning and strategizing book, “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.” Porter’s generic competitive strategy is a framework that is useful for planning the strategic direction of your business that assists with gaining an advantage in the marketplace over your competitors. Micahel Porter(1980)  set out to uncover the ways companies maintain long-term advantages over their competitors.  Generic Competitive Strategies, three interconnected concepts that most organizations use to develop key operating procedures and outmaneuver competitors.

Porter identified three generic strategies that can be implemented in any industry (and by companies of any size.). Porter called the generic strategies "Cost Leadership" (no frills), "Differentiation" (creating uniquely desirable products and services) and "Focus" (offering a specialized service in a niche market). He then subdivided the Focus strategy into two parts: "Cost Focus" and "Differentiation Focus."



Cost leadership

The companies that follow this strategy has  goal to increase profits by reducing costs while charging industry-standard prices, or to increase market share by reducing the sales price while retaining profits.

The cost leadership allows a competitive edge by manipulating production costs. It does this in two important ways:

  • Charging lower prices to increase market share. This is done by casting the company as a low-cost alternative, which increases both sales and the company’s profile.
  • Reducing costs to increase profits. With fewer expenses on the books, organizations can move money into other avenues, like salaries or product research.

It often depends on the specifics of their given industry. Many business ventures will have access to capital for investing in technology and infrastructure. These kinds of adjustments and innovations help businesses bring down costs. It also helps to minimize the standard operating expenses. As an extension of that, proper logistics are crucial. Companies must be able to effectively manage the flow of products between the point of creation and respective storefronts.

In cost leadership strategy companies charge a lower price but their volumes are larger. Therefore, volume of business allows a company to maintain its profits and expand its market share. 

Companies that are successful in achieving Cost Leadership usually have:

·         Access to the capital needed to invest in technology that will bring costs down.

·         Very efficient logistics.

·         A low-cost base (labor, materials, facilities), and a way of sustainably cutting costs below those of other competitors.

The greatest risk in pursuing a Cost Leadership strategy is that these sources of cost reduction are not unique to you, and that other competitors copy your cost reduction strategies. This is why it's important to continuously find ways of reducing every cost. One successful way of doing this is by adopting the Japanese Kaizen  philosophy of "continuous improvement."

 

One real-world business who has championed Cost Leadership is Wal-Mart. The conglomerate has built its model partly on low prices, continually promising to beat those of its competitors. Executives are able to do that because Wal-Mart has an especially efficient supply chain, often sourcing products from less expensive foreign markets.

Another brilliant example of cost leadership is the Swedish furniture retailer Ikea. This company offers furniture at amazing low price. It’s the best example of innovativeness. Ikea is able to keep its prices low because it sources its products from low-wage countries. It saves on labour cost and it does not assemble or deliver furniture; customers must collect the furniture from  the warehouse and assemble at home themselves. Thought from convenience point of view this is less suitable, customers still buy it from Ikea because of the lowest price tags.

The product could still be priced at competitive parity (same prices as others), but because of the lower cost of production, the company would be able to sustain itself even through lean times and invest more into the business all throughout.

Examples are the TPS system developed by the Toyota Motor Company. The TPS system aims to cut costs throughout the company, but Toyota cars are still priced at almost the same levels as American or other Japanese cars.

1. Moser Baer India

·         Noida UP based world-class mfg. company

·         Well known for CD’s

·         Among the top three global companies for the data storage business

2. GCMMF – Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation –  Brand Amul – Ice Cream market

 

Differentiation

To implement this strategy, your company's products need to be significantly better than the competition's, improving their competitiveness and value to the public. It requires thorough research and development, plus effective sales and marketing.

 The Differentiation method looks to develop product uniqueness and attractiveness to engage customers. Once again, there are a number of concepts involved in this approach, and each one is all about playing to customers’ perceptions. That might include promoting a product’s durability and general utility, which appeals to a customer’s sense of value. It could also involve touting the support system for a service or product, which creates a certain air of accountability. Finally, there is also the notion of brand image, creating meaningful connections with customers to ensure long-term loyalty. Companies that differentiate want to meet customers’ unique needs, and are rewarded with premium prices.

To properly implement the Differentiation strategy, a company needs the following:

  • Marketing and promotions teams. These individuals are on the frontlines of defining a brand and emphasizing its uniqueness.
  • Delivering high-quality products. Customers won’t stay loyal if the reality doesn’t meet the company’s promises.
  • Ongoing research and innovation. Only by pushing technological boundaries can a company hope to maintain relevancy.

Large organizations pursuing a differentiation strategy need to stay agile with their new product development processes. Otherwise, they risk attack on several fronts by competitors pursuing Focus Differentiation strategies in different market segments.

One of the more successful examples of the Differentiation approach is McDonald’s. Over the years, the fast food giant has used technology and research to gain consistently loyal customers, including efforts to reduce wait times and marketing directly to children.

Etsy is an online artisan store and shopping gallery which has used differentiation strategy wisely. Etsy offers its users a platform to showcase their handmade wares and sell them to customers around the world. Hence this store is called as a crafter’s paradise. Etsy has carved a niche for itself through sales of craft supplies as well as homemade items. Through Etsy, the community of crafters has found a home on the internet and the world has been opened to the amateur artisan/crafter those who wish to sell their products. The Etsy business model brings together the artists and the business savvy of investors who are keen to support the ideas and talent of craftsmen. This business model has worked wonders for Etsy.

Differentiation is a marketing term used to describe the process of developing promotional messages that distinguish products from those offered by competitors. The differentiation plank is created in the minds of target customers. Effective differentiation is critical to building a strong business model. Samsung has adopted differentiation strategy by providing its customers large numbers of service centers network, online technical support, entertaining online complaints, live chats with customers and phone support. Each year Samsung invests minimum 9% of its sales revenue in R&D activity. It believes in innovative concepts and innovative marketing strategies. 

A variety of products, each branded and promoted differently with levels of function, allows a company to 'desensitize' prices, and on the basis of being different, charge premium or higher prices. This strategy also provides a hedge against different markets and product life cycles, allowing cash flow to come in even if a few products decline, while others grow or mature.

A prime example of this strategy is Hindustan Lever, which, while focused on FMCG, has a range of products even within the soaps category for different segments. Such a strategy needs strong segmentation, marketing and branding skills.

·         Orient Fans: Kolkata based C K Birls organization, premium price, exports to many stores including Walmart, technology differentiation- Air delivery, the reach of air and electricity consumption

·         Gati – A multinational transport company, technology-driven company, delivering premium value to the customers
Differentiation- risk insurance for shipments, refund on failure to deliver on time, door to door pick up and delivery, time-bound operations, online tracking and safer transportation

·         Parle Agro -Frooti – the packaging

Focus

Successful implementation entails the company selecting niche markets in which to sell their goods. It requires an intense understanding of the marketplace, its sellers, buyers and competitors. More information about the generic strategies is available in Porter's 1985 book, Competitive Advantage (Free Press).

The Focus approach, however, eschews mass appeal, instead layering efforts toward one niche market. Companies who choose to adopt this strategy are taking a deliberate risk. On the one hand, by engaging a specific demographic – many of which are often underserved – the company is able to captivate an increasingly loyal pool of consumers. Unfortunately, research has shown that catering to only a select group of people might prove unattractive to those outside the group. Thus, these companies become almost solely dependent on the spending habits of a very small percentage of people.

Within the Focus strategy, there are two distinct variants:

  • Cost Focus: Here, companies are looking to find a cost advantage in their intended market segment.
  • Differentiation Focus: These companies work to find as unique of a market as possible in order to maximize efforts.

Regardless of the specific variant, Focus is all about balancing the relationship between production costs and delivery. Cost Focus intends to find those markets where costs are optimal, while Cost Differentiation emphasizes the buyer’s unique needs.

PepsiCo is among the largest consumer packaged goodscompanies in the U.S. It achieved this by absorbing a number of smaller companies that helped it develop an edge in the beverage industry. The company’s subsidiaries include Tropicana, Naked Juice, Frito-Lay and the South Beach Beverage Company.

For example, Porche markets to the particular segment that likes fast and expensive cars and can afford it. A company in a niche market has customers who understand, appreciate and can pay a premium for their indulgence. Competitive advantage - either by cost or differentiation- is created specially for the niche. But the risks are that the niche may not grow, or it may disappear with time and change.

 

Examples of niche markets are organic foods which are more expensive, but with promise of better quality and enhanced for environment protection. Another example of a niche is of traditional 35mm film cameras and films; these have become rare. The producers no longer enjoy the same economies of scale, but some consumers still like to use it.

CafĂ© Coffee Day in India. This chain of coffee restaurants brought in the concept of cafes to India where the young and the old can sit for a while, chat, discuss, and meet over a steaming cup of coffee. The first one opened in 1996 on Brigade Road in Bangalore. At CCD, people can have leisure meetings. Nobody disturbs or asks you to vacate the table. The concept instantaneously became a hit. It has a target audience of educated, serious people in big cities and metros where meeting places are in shortage.  Another appreciation CCD has capped is that there are also 11,000 small growers in India from whom they source coffee from.



Narrow target and advantage in uniqueness: M.A.C. cosmetics, founded in Toronto in the mid-1980s, follows a focused differentiation by selling a wide variety of cruelty-free products for the everyday consumer: eyeshadows, lipsticks, lip gloss, foundations, concealer, nail polish, mascara and stage makeup. MAC also sells fragrances and make-up brushes. They sell skin care products as well.

 

Stuck in the Middle

 

A company that tries to engage in each generic strategy but fails to achieve any of them, is considered ‘stuck in the middle’. Such a company has no competitive advantage regardless of the industry it is in. As a matter of fact, such a company will compete at a disadvantage because the ‘cost leader’, the ‘differentiators’ and the ‘focusers’ in the industry will be better positioned to compete. It may be the case, however, that a company that is stuck in the middle still earns interesting profits simply because it is operating in a highly attractive industry or because its competitors are stuck in the middle as well. If one of the two exceptions are not present it will be very hard for companies to engage in both differentiation and cost leadership, Porter argues, because differentiation is usually costly. Each generic strategy is a fundamentally different approach to creating and sustaining superior performance and requires a different operating model.   

 

 

Generic strategies apply to not-for-profit organizations too.

A not-for-profit can use a Cost Leadership strategy to minimize the cost of getting donations and achieving more for its income, while one pursuing a Differentiation strategy will be committed to the very best outcomes, even if the volume of work it does, as a result, is smaller.

Local charities are great examples of organizations using Focus strategies to get donations and contribute to their communities.

 

Steps to help you choose.

When companies need to choose one out of three strategies they need to take into account their SWOT analysis. Also organizations need to do the five force analysis of the industry. Companies must select the generic strategy that gives them the strongest set of options because it is the starting point of strategic decisions making.

Step 1:

For each generic strategy, carry out a SWOT Analysis   of your strengths and weaknesses, and the opportunities and threats you would face, if you adopted that strategy.

Having done this, it may be clear that your organization is unlikely to be able to make a success of some of the generic strategies.

Step 2:

Use Five Forces Analysis   to understand the nature of the industry you are in.

Step 3:

Compare the SWOT Analyses of the viable strategic options with the results of your Five Forces analysis. For each strategic option, ask yourself how you could use that strategy to:

·         Reduce or manage supplier power.

·         Reduce or manage buyer/customer power.

·         Come out on top of the competitive rivalry.

·         Reduce or eliminate the threat of substitution.

·         Reduce or eliminate the threat of new entry.

Select the generic strategy that gives you the strongest set of options.

 

Porter’s advise on choosing the right strategy: Porter says that organizations must spend time and efforts before they make choice of which generic strategy to pursue because it underpins every other strategic decision. He cautions organizations to use not more than one strategy. One of the most important reasons why companies must use only one of the three strategies is because the entire planned feeling revolves around it. Cost Leadership requires a very detailed internal focus on processes. Differentiation, on the other hand, demands an outward-facing, highly creative approach.

Criticisms of Porter’s Generic Strategies

 Like many business frameworks, Porter’s Generic Strategies Model has both proponents and opponents. Among others, Miller (1992) has questioned Porter’s notion of having to pursue one single strategy or else being caught ‘stuck in the middle’. He claims that there is a viable middle-ground between strategies and uses the example of Caterpillar Inc, which differentiated itself by producing the highest quality earth-moving equipment in the world while paying attention to cost-efficiency. Miller argues that strategic specialization, as Porter suggests, has the danger of becoming inflexible and blind to customer needs. Also Chan Kim and Mauborgne (2005) abandon the ‘value-cost’ trade-off that a company needs to choose between certain strategies. With their Blue Ocean Strategy they advice companies to pursue differentiation and low cost simultaneously: it is about driving costs down while simultaneously driving value up for buyers. However, there are also popular authors who do believe in Porter’s idea of competitive choice. Treacy and Wiersema (1995) for example build further on Porter’s idea and modified Porter’s Generic Strategies into the Value Disciplines. They advise companies to choose between Operational Excellence, Product Leadership and Customer Intimacy.



No comments:

Post a Comment